letter sent to the mayor by all the leaders of the Socialist Party of Montevarchi (including Councillors and Municipal Councillor) in order to shed light on our press and mix to a possible further controversy in the bud.
Dear Mayor
read your October 16, the current difficulties have not to say that we never thought of or wanted to say that you'll be considered an affiliate and we apologize for this misunderstanding.
no coincidence that this injury does not appear in any part of our statement in response to InComune of 9 last year. The interpretation given by you of the relationship between the term pizzino and your person is entirely subjective and do not belong to us. Actually, it seems a little 'forced. If someone were to misunderstand the very first obtain deny excuse.
mean, however, and if you read carefully you will seem manifest a tendency allusion, an encrypted message that bring up the past to de-legitimize beliefs now well in the text of InComune. It was not the first time this happens we wanted to express our disappointment. We have explained well when we write we do not want to use this style. We believe that this is not the best way to argue his case, especially when you consider that these reasons are those which could lead to better choices for the city. Moreover, in journalistic language is well established use of the term pizzino with this meaning. One need only recall the headlines and the news services when, during a TV broadcast of "La7" (November 2009), Senator PD Latorre pass a quick note to Hon. Bocchino, then PDL, to suggest topics for discussion with the Hon. Massimo Donadi IDV.
agree with you that can occur in political discourse, even among coalition partners, a conflict between different ideas, all legitimate. This legitimacy, however, can not be established only in the abstract and must be respected by each of the actors in the field. And this, in recent times, there seems to be always the case.
Convinced he had clarified the terms of debate,
We send you warm greetings.
Dear Mayor
read your October 16, the current difficulties have not to say that we never thought of or wanted to say that you'll be considered an affiliate and we apologize for this misunderstanding.
no coincidence that this injury does not appear in any part of our statement in response to InComune of 9 last year. The interpretation given by you of the relationship between the term pizzino and your person is entirely subjective and do not belong to us. Actually, it seems a little 'forced. If someone were to misunderstand the very first obtain deny excuse.
mean, however, and if you read carefully you will seem manifest a tendency allusion, an encrypted message that bring up the past to de-legitimize beliefs now well in the text of InComune. It was not the first time this happens we wanted to express our disappointment. We have explained well when we write we do not want to use this style. We believe that this is not the best way to argue his case, especially when you consider that these reasons are those which could lead to better choices for the city. Moreover, in journalistic language is well established use of the term pizzino with this meaning. One need only recall the headlines and the news services when, during a TV broadcast of "La7" (November 2009), Senator PD Latorre pass a quick note to Hon. Bocchino, then PDL, to suggest topics for discussion with the Hon. Massimo Donadi IDV.
agree with you that can occur in political discourse, even among coalition partners, a conflict between different ideas, all legitimate. This legitimacy, however, can not be established only in the abstract and must be respected by each of the actors in the field. And this, in recent times, there seems to be always the case.
Convinced he had clarified the terms of debate,
We send you warm greetings.
0 comments:
Post a Comment